silversolitaire: (House FTW)
So, I've finally seen X3, too! Yay! Now I can join in with all the ranting and raving!

What can I say, I enjoyed it. It really takes a lot for me to not enjoy a superhero movie. What can I say, I'm shallow. Of course, I was grinning like a fool through the entire trailer of Superman Returns. I didn't even know I was gonna like it, but hey, when you see Superman flying into a plane wing or dodging a bullet with his eyeball, how can you NOT simper like a madman? Aaaanyway, back to X3. I actually have a lot of ranty comments. That's a GOOD thing. Whenever I go "Yeah, it was nice" about a movie it means it didn't suck but it didn't impress me either. Whenever I feel like I have to crack a dozen jokes about it and rant and LOL at it, then it means I really liked it. Nyaha.

Now, let's see if I can round up all my comments again... It's kinda hard to remember them. I should take notes, but that'd take it a bit too far, I guess... Heh... Some technicalities first. I'm really starting to get fed up with that damn theater. It's the second time in a row they've messed up the projection. Last week during The Da Vinci Code they simply forgot to switch on the projector and I had to walk out and yell at someone. Now the picture kinda made a jump during the trailers and the image was spliced in two. Right in the middle of the trailer to Pirates of the Caribbean 2, YOU BITCHES!!!! After it was "fixed" the bottom was cut off, so I actually didn't see shit of the captions. No clue what they said, where scenes took place and when. Annoyiiiiiing.

Since everything was already being so shitty I totally expected to have the scene after the end credits cut off, too. It's not like they've never done that before. Like when I dragged dad into Chamber of Secrets for a second time and I was all "We gotta wait for the end credits, they're totally LOL!" and then the dumbass switched off the projector -____-. Anyway, I was totally expecting that, really. And of course I didn't want that to happen with the end being the way it is and all. Somewhere during the end fight, those seven brats came storming into the theater and started running up and down the aisles all the time. Fucking annoying. I had to yell at them several times. Then when the end credits rolled one brat yelled "Turn on the lights!!!" so I hollered back "It's not over yet!!!!". I spent the rest of the end credits in agony that they'd switch off the projector. Other than me there were only like 5 other people in the theater and they all left. Well, they didn't switch it off, so I saw it and now I'm kinda "buh?". I just read up some comments on IMDB so I'm getting it now. When did I become so daft? Haha...

Okay, spoilers now. )
silversolitaire: (bushed)
So, I went ahead and watched the movie on Tuesday. It was a rather impulsive decision since I saw the program and that it was a special showing. I'm not really sure what to think of it, in all honesty. I definitely liked the first movie a lot better than the sequel. Don't get me wrong. It was definitely funny and entertaining and I'm not sorry for the time and money I've spent watching it, but still... it was lacking.

Cut for spoilers )
silversolitaire: (Default)
First we have Mr. Lee who is "shocked" by BBM not winning Best Picture.
Lee Shocked by 'Brokeback' Loss

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon director Ang Lee was devastated Brokeback Mountain lost out on the Best Picture Oscar to Crash, but insists he is still proud of the movie The director was disappointed that his film didn't take home the top honor and is baffled as to why it didn't win. He explains, "I would do exactly the same. I'm so proud of the movie. They (the Academy) didn't vote for it, I don't know (why)...I'm just glad the audience embraced it. It was a surprise (not winning), quite frankly." In addition to Lee's Oscar, the film also won awards for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Score.

As much as I enjoyed BBM and would have loved for it to take home every single award it had been nominated for, I think Ang Lee is being rather ungrateful here. He won Best Direction, for crying out loud. That's a valuable and prestigious award. Directing geniuses such as Martin Scorcese haven't even gotten one, so be grateful! This is a nod directed at you specifically. Why can't you be happy about that?

Talk about screwing up a good experience. Here is BBM, taking home three awards (which might be the best score, next to King Kong who also won three if I haven't lost count? How many did Geisha get? At any rate, it's one of the more successful movies at the Oscars) and instead of celebrating it and being damn relieved that the movie didn't turn into one of those that are being praised and heralded as the best picture evar and then leave the show with not a single golden guy in their hands, he goes around and says how devastated he is that he didn't won Best Picture. That's sad, Ang.
Clooney Inspired Real Life Character To Lose Weight

Actor/director George Clooney's role as "pudgy" CIA agent Bob Baer in Syriana inspired the real-life character to get in shape. Ocean's Eleven star Clooney, who won the Best Supporting Actor Oscar for his portrayal of Baer, packed on the weight for his performance in the film. He explains, "The gentleman that I was playing in the movie, Bob Baer, was sort of pudgy and out of shape. I thought that was a pretty good thing. Then he found out a Hollywood guy was playing him, and he got in shape. It sort of screwed everything up for me."

Clooney was absolutely darling in the award show. He was so yummy and handsome, sitting there in the front row, smiling his mysterious smile. How can you not adore a man who's coveted by so many people, men and women, who acts out a skit where he's lying in bed with another man? And he was so sexy about that, too! *purrs* I also loved that one acceptance speech where the chick thanked the Academy for seating her next to Clooney in the luncheon! XD; But I digress. Ehem. Anyway, that's a bummer for him! Hehehe... amused me when I read that. But at least he recovered well!
Oscar Guests May Be Hit with Taxes

Guests who took home gift-packed bags from Sunday's 78th Annual Academy Awards ceremony may have to pay $30,000 in taxes on their new acquisitions. The bags, which included a $7,000 Victoria's Secret underwear set and a coupon for Lasik surgery, are worth approximately $100,000 each. And unfortunately for the celebrities present, the Unites States Inland Revenue Service has declared that the bags given to Oscar attendees count as taxable income. IRS commissioner Mark Everson quips, "We want to make sure the stars 'walk the line' when it comes to these goody bags."

That one makes me gloat as hell. I've never seen the point of these goodie bags in the first place. Why do you need to shower Oscar nominees with these kinds of gifts anyway, especially when they are totally unrelated to their nomination. It's just really opportunistic of them to rush at it like flies. Especially since these people earn a lot of money already to begin with. So it really pleases me that they might end up having to pay 30k in taxed for crap stuff they don't really want or need but just had to grab because it was freeeeeeeeee! *nyatch*

And now for something completely different, only remotely Oscar-related:
Lucas: "The Blockbuster Is Dead"

Movie mogul George Lucas predicts Hollywood will soon start shifting away from mega-budget blockbusters in favor of making more independent films for less money. Alongside Steven Spielberg, Star Wars creator Lucas is cited as being chiefly responsible for the blockbuster phenomenon that has gripped the movie industry for the last three decades. But he now believes big-budget films can no longer be profitable and are going out of fashion, as evidenced by this year's Academy Award nominees, including independent movies Crash and Good Night, And Good Luck. Lucas tells the New York Daily News, "The market forces that exist today make it unrealistic to spend $200 million on a movie. Those movies can't make their money back anymore. Look at what happened with King Kong. I think it's great that the major Oscar nominations have gone to independent films. Is that good for the business? No - it's bad for the business. But movie-making isn't about business. It's about art. In the future, almost everything that gets shown in theaters will be indie movies. I predict that by 2025 the average movie will cost only $15 million."

And here we have good old Mr. George Lucas singing the swan song of the blockbuster and whining about the movie genre being dead that he practically created. Okay okay, technically it was Stephen Spielberg but he certainly had a part in it. We can thank him for the invention of excessive merchandising, too. So now Mr. Lucas fears that filmmakers no longer can make obscenely expensive movies and earn a shitload of money with it. I wouldn't be surprised if this was yet another jab at movie piracy and the blossoming DVD market.

But it's not just that, Mr. Lucas! There are so many factors influencing this, like a general poor market situation. People go to the movies less often now because it just gets more and more expensive. There's the tickets which just keep getting expensive, popcorn, soda, parking etc. Most families can't afford going to the movies with their kids anymore because they need to cough up 50 bucks a pop. And honestly, Lucas is partly to blame for that. Remember when Episode I came in the theaters and Lucas was the first to introduce a minimum profit, asking for a set amount of money for every single ticket sold, thus scaring every theater owner into ending up losing thousands of dollars, jacking up the prices in the process. Thanks for that, btw. Our local theater never lowered the prices afterwards. So don't be such a hypocrite about that.

And then of course there's the fact that people no longer want to wait months for the damn movie to be released in their country. I remember, again, when Episode I was released it hit the theaters in the US in April and came to Europe around July / August. It was one of the first movies that was filmed secretly and distributed via the internet. People just no longer want to put up with this anymore. Thankfully moviemakers have mostly learnt their lesson and hurry up with the distribution now. But some people still goof up occasionally.

Anyway, it just strikes me as extremely whiney for George Lucas to complain about independent movies taking all the Oscars this year and the blockbusters staying behind. Hasn't that always been a trend? That's basically the core definition of a blockbuster movie. It's about special effects, about profits, sensations. It was never about the art of making movies. Blockbusters traditionally take the technical awards for sound, special effects etc. but hardly ever the prestigious ones. It's not that new. And there haven't been so many blockbusters this year to begin with. I mean, no more Lord of the Rings, Narnia wasn't really that good and did take the costumes award anyway, Harry Potter never gets any awards anyway and King Kong got a bunch. So what's your problem? *rolls eyes*

78th Oscars

Mar. 6th, 2006 02:01 am
silversolitaire: (Default)
(again, updating as we speak)

Okay cutting because it's kinda getting long )
silversolitaire: (Default)
(updating as I watch)

Michelle Williams looks surprisingly glamorous. Her yellow dress looks amazing with her hair and all. Didn't think she had it in her. Of course it all goes to hell as soon as she opens her mouth.

WTF happened to Keanue Reeves' face? You know, it IS possible to age and still remain a youthful look without looking like you're wearing a plastic mask. Jeeeeeesus. I happened to read this report on how people who are admitted to the Oscar suites get free Botox. Maybe he took a shot too many.

Dude, Bob Hopkins has grown old. I still remember him of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" fame! ;_;

And noooooooooooo, I don't want to see King Kong die! That's the very reason I didn't go see it! Make it go awaaaaaaaay!

Oh my GOD, Felicity Huffman, wtf is wrong with her bust? Hurray for not having a boob job, but you really shouldn't wear such a deeply cut dress when your breasts look like that. Sorry, but that's my opinion. Heh, the message by the DH girls was kinda cute though. What are they calling her? Flicka?

Yeah I realize I'm kinda in a foul mood right now but shucks, who cares.

Yay Oscars starting now. Gonna open a new thread :D.
silversolitaire: (silly)
Jackson Signs Without Reading Script

Pulp Fiction star Samuel L. Jackson was so amused by the title of new movie Snakes On A Plane, he signed up without reading the script. The movie features an assassin who intends to kill a passenger on a flight by releasing a batch of deadly snakes. Jackson explains, "I didn't even read the script - I just saw the title, 'Snakes on a Plane' and said 'Ok, good. I'm there.' You have got to love that. That's exactly what it is - 500 poisonous snakes released on a flight from Hawaii to Los Angeles. They are (set free) on a time release half-way there, so we can't go back, we've got to keep going. It's fun!"


I remember when that movie was announced for the first time... maybe a year ago or so. I think it was even somewhere around April 1st *g*. Anyway, nobody believed it. Everybody was like "This has got to be a joke!" But then the movie stayed listed, there were more reports about it, a release date was named, a trailer released... And then everybody realized, "OMG it's not a joke! O.O;;;" Then the voices were raised, "Uhm... what were they smoking when they thought of that title???" and general ridicule and mockery ensued, vastly directed at Samuel L. Jackson for signing up for such a stupid movie. So, reading this newsbit really amuses and pleases me, because apparently Jackson was very much aware of how dumb the movie is and he just did it "for the lulz". Cool guy.
silversolitaire: (Default)
Something [livejournal.com profile] maantje might get a kick out of! :B
'Jurassic Park 4' To Begin Shooting Next Year?

Director Steven Spielberg will reportedly begin filming the fourth installment of Jurassic Park next year. The Munich director is also currently getting ready to resurrect the Indiana Jones franchise with Harrison Ford later this year. Producer Frank Marshall confirms the script for the next version of the dinosaur epic has been finalized: "It has a good script now, so we should have that one up and running next year, for release in 2008." The character of Lexie, the granddaughter of Sir Richard Attenborough's character, is expected to be the lead role in the new film, according to Moviehole.net.
And this one's particularily tasty.
Ledger Asks Gyllenhaal To Be Godfather

Heath Ledger is so close to his Brokeback Mountain co-star Jake Gyllenhaal, he has asked him to be Godfather to his four-month-old daughter Matilda. Gyllenhaal, whose turn in the movie earned him a Best Supporting Actor BAFTA on Sunday, credits the movie with building a unique bond between them. He says, "Heath and I are best friends now, making the film was very intense for us. I'm actually Godfather to Heath's daughter Matilda, which is an amazing honor."

Did you hear that sound? It's the squeal of thousands of slashgirls collectively going bananas.

OMG!

Feb. 20th, 2006 01:39 pm
silversolitaire: (Default)
Craig's Teeth Knocked Out

New James Bond star Daniel Craig was left toothless and bleeding when a fight scene for upcoming movie Casino Royale went horribly wrong. The British actor, who was shooting in Prague, Czech Republic, had his London-based dentist flown out to fix caps onto his broken teeth. Craig now has to sport gum shields during action scenes for protection. An insider says, "Daniel was filming with some minor actors when he got hit in the face. He was reeling from a heavy blow and staggered back holding his face. He put his hand to his mouth but the blood started to seep through his fingers - it was horrible."

That is HORRIBLE! I have this deeply rooted fear of / disgust for teeth being knocked out. For one, I always fear it could happen to me, secondly, it's one of the most disfiguring, irreversible injuries you can sustain in your face, IMO. I mean, sure, you can always get fake teeth, but it's just not the same. You'll never have sensitivity in them again, they'll never be as sturdy and useful as your real teeth. It's just horrible.

I don't really know Craig all that much, haven't seen any movies with him yet (at least not that I'm aware of... I might have, but he just didn't leave a lasting impression), didn't want him to play Bond, but this is really really bad. I feel sorry for him. I know he's getting help and the best possible treatment, but nobody should lose their teeth x.x;. Now I guess I should be happy that Pierce Brosnan isn't Bond anymore >.>;;;. Imagine him being the one losing the teeth! *cries*
silversolitaire: (huggle)
Jake Gyllenhaal won the BAFTA Award for Best Supporting Actor for Brokeback Mountain. Muchly please. Now Jake has taken home an award as well. BM won Best Film, Director and Screenplay, too. Looking good for the Oscars.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll crawl into a corner and die. *whimpers at backpain*
silversolitaire: (silly)
OMG I just literally choked on my chocolate when I read that! *coughs and laughs*

First a Gay Cowboy Movie; Now a Gay Cowboy Song

The breakthrough gay-romance movie Brokeback Mountain may have produced a never-to-be-expected consequence in country music, as well. According to the Associated Press, country-music icon Willie Nelson on Tuesday (Valentine's Day) released what the wire service described as probably "the first gay cowboy song by a major recording artist." The song, "Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly (Fond of Each Other)" was made available on Apple's iTunes Music Store after first being played on Howard Stern's satellite radio show. A.P. did not indicate whether the recording will have a more general release. Nelson sings "He Was a Friend of Mine" on the Brokeback Mountain soundtrack.

"Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly (Fond of Each Other)"... ahahahaha... priceless. Does anybody know where I can listen to this song? *chuckles*
silversolitaire: (Default)
Oldman Will Make Harry Potter Return

Harry Potter producers have confirmed Gary Oldman will reprise his role as Sirius Black in Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix - despite reports to the contrary. Oldman, who has appeared in the last two movies adapted from JK Rowling's popular children's books, has yet to be signed for a third term - even though filming for Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix has already begun. But producer David Heyman insists there is plenty of time for Oldman to sign up: "We're not shooting his part for quite a while, and as is always the case, you begin with the parts that are most pressing. We have every intention of having Gary Oldman play Sirius Black." The 47-year-old is currently shooting Zodiac in Los Angeles with director David Fincher.

Mystery solved. I hope. LOL

And a tidbit on BBM:

Ledger Explains Ennis Choice

Actor Heath Ledger agreed to play the role of Ennis Del Mar in Brokeback Mountain because he was keen to express the cowboy's repressed emotions through body language. Director Ang Lee allowed Ledger to choose between the two leading male roles, and Ledger found he could identify with Ennis' struggle. He explains, "I really liked that he had very few words to express his battle. I like representing emotions in the body and in the voice." The actor perfected the character's accent by combining the regional accent of Wyoming and adding "a splash of Texas." He adds, "The accent and the mouth, the clenched fist... he was a clenched person and any form of expression I wanted to be painful, including words and speaking. The words had to fight their way out from within."

Yeah he totally managed to get that one down, IMO. Sometimes Ennis is so repressed, it hurts. While watching I often felt like every muscle of my body was tense when Ennis' scenes came up, because you could just feel the struggle he was going through. Amazing acting there.
silversolitaire: (pissed)
Oldman Axed from Harry Potter Film?

Actor Gary Oldman looks unlikely to reprise his role as Sirius Black in the next Harry Potter offering, after reports he has been mysteriously axed from the wizard franchise. Oldman, who has appeared in the last two movies adapted from JK Rowling's popular children's books, has yet to be signed for a third term - even though filming for Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix has already begun. The actor's manager, Douglas Urbanski, tells British newspaper The Sun, "You will be shocked to learn there are no plans for Gary to appear in the film. To say we are puzzled is an understatement at the very least! We are left with no choice but to pursue other employment for him." Vanessa Davis, spokeswoman for production company Warner Brothers, confirms no deal has been reached, but insists there is still time to resolve the confusion. She says, "With any film the priority is confirming the cast who will be on the set from the outset."

[source]

EDIT:

Aaaah, thank God! Apparently the rumor has been axed already two days ago and IMDB just is being slow on the uptake again. Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] eiluned for pointing that out! x_x; God, that would have been HORRible! Just when it had finally been confirmed that the original cast would be reprising the lead roles. I mean, there has been so much talk about how the main cast would be way too old by the time cameras would be rolling for OotP blablabla, so there was always this slight twinge of fear that the producers would totally lose it and recast the main cast. People have been known to do a lot more retarded things than that. Wouldn't it have been terrible now to either somehow, totally inexplicably, write out Sirius or replace Oldman?!? God, I don't even want to imagine it. Of course, there's always the slight possibility that there has been a development lately, but I'm willing to bet my shinies on IMDB just being slow. It has to be! O.O
silversolitaire: (bushed)

IMDB's Top 100 Best Movies of All Time
generate this HTML for your own page at ObeytheFist.com


The Results )

Which movies have you seen?



IMDB's Top 100 Indy Movies of All Time
generate this HTML for your own page at ObeytheFist.com


The Independent Results )

Which Independent movies have you seen?



Wtf, Terminator is Indy? Yeah right.

IMDB's Top 100 Crappy Movies of All Time
generate this HTML for your own page at ObeytheFist.com


The Unfortunate Results )

Which Unfortunate movies have you seen?

silversolitaire: (Default)
The movie list for my intermediate exams... yay?

Silent Film:
D.W. Griffith - The Birth of a Nation, 1915
Charles Chaplin - The Gold Rush, 1925
King Vidor - The Crowd, 1928

Comedy:
Frank Capra - It Happened One Night, 1934
Charles Chaplin - Modern Times, 1936
Billy Wilder - Some Like It Hot, 1959

Western:
John Ford - Stagecoach, 1939
Fred Zinnemann - High Noon, 1952
John Ford - The Searchers, 1956

Drama / Thriller:
William Wyler - Dead End, 1937
Orson Welles - Citizen Kane, 1941
Alfred Hitchcock - Rear Window, 1954
Martin Scorcese - Taxi Driver, 1976

War / Gangster:
Howard Hawks - Scarface: The Shame of the Nation, 1932
Michael Curtiz - Casablanca, 1942
Francis Ford Coppola - The Godfather, 1972
Francis Ford Coppola - Apocalyse Now, 1979

New / Off Hollywood:
Dennis Hopper - Easy Rider, 1969
George Lucas - American Graffiti, 1973
David Lynch - Blue Velvet, 1986
Quentin Tarantino - Pulp Fiction, 1994
silversolitaire: (bushed)
I made a list of all my DVDs... it's about time, since I keep forgetting which one's I already have. I should also make one for my CDs and my mangas. Especially my mangas. Damn, I haven't been buying any for three months or so because I can't remember which ones I already have and they're spread all over the house and my flat, so I can't even find out which ones I have x_x. I like making lists.

*snips after some consideration, since nobody isn't really interested anyway and I'm only doing this because I'm bored... so yeah* )

A couple of weird statistics...

I own 112 DVDs.

33 (29.5%) are animated movies.

8 of which are anime (Hm... I don't have that many anime DVDs... *looks at multiple hundreds downloaded animes* ... I suck)

20 (17.9%) of these 112 DVDs are gay themed...
with notable mentioning of... )

Movies that feature Ewan McGregor, Jonathan Rhys-Meyers or anybody even remotely related to movies that feature them (such as Rupert Everett or Christian Bale): 22 (19.6%)

Detailed list and odd theory )

Okay, I'll stop now...

OMG!

Oct. 28th, 2002 01:31 am
silversolitaire: (d'oh!)
I just saw the worst movie ever!

Witchouse! (yes, that's how it's spelled)

Seven teenagers get stuck in an old mansion and suddenly find themselves facing a nightmare in the form of a random witch who just so happens to be the ancestor of one of the teens. Clichée girl #1, thus dubbed Gothic teen, realizes her 300 year old pledge for revenge. Insert Horror Plot (TM).

[spoilers follow... like you care]

Further clichée teens include: Brainy Girl (who gets one close-up at the end which reveals her to be drop-dead gorgeous actually), Sexy Girl (who gives a bunch of perky comments and is so tough, like... you know), aforementioned Gothic Girl, Sexy Stud #1 and #2, one of which dates Sexy Girl and Brainy Guy (of course he doesn't date Brainy Guy! Now that would have been too nice...). *counts* I missed one. Oh never mind!

So, Gothic Teen finds out she's the decendant of some witch (Lilith, complete with crappy make-up that puts the Buffy vampires to shame and some sort of pseudo scary distorted voice that reminds you of Kermit on crack) who suddenly rises from the dead, starts killing most of the kids who then randomly turn into ghoulish creatures when they were all fine just two minutes ago. Sexy Stud #2 (or was it #1? Who cares!) gets the gory special effect, ooooooh, by having his head ripped off in a fashion that makes his neck look like this: I^^^^I. They must have been out of fake blood though since even though Brainy Girl was "bleeding like a pig" there wasn't even a stain on her jacket.

All but the Brainy Teens turn into ghouls or have their heads ripped off, when Brainy Guy suddenly realizes the whole story, faces the witch with his sudden knowledge ("I shall burn this book and then you can't take over the world like you planned all along!!") and defeats the witch by putting electric wires into her body, making her (and the ghouls) go POIGHT!!! Then Gothic Girll comes in, pledges everlasting revenge which is immediately prevented by Brainy Girl who steps out from behind the Brainy Guy, announces she's the decendant of the baby that was supposed to be sacrificed 300 years ago ("Do you remember..?") and kills Gothic Girl with some pendant she produced out of nowhere. Brainy Girl and Guy embrace ("Shut up and kiss me!"). The End.

Brain damage after only 65 mins.: severe. Good thing it wasn't the standard 90 mins.

I think having my wisdom teeth removed hurt less. This story makes no sense whatsoever. It's not even funny to watch, it's just painfully bad. Don't waste your time. Watch the news instead, that's scarier!
silversolitaire: (shocked)
Potter hormones in overdrive as he turns 15
By FIONA WHITTY

HARRY Potter is set to get SMOOCHY in his new book - by falling under the spell of a girl.

Author JK Rowling has revealed the schoolboy wizard’s hormones start "working overtime" as he turns 15.

And that means fans can expect sauciness as well as sorcery at the famous Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

Rowling, 36, admits "more boy-girl stuff" is inevitable. But she REFUSED to say if Harry’s bossy chum Hermione - played by Helen Watson in the current Potter movie - is the target of his love interest.

Rowling says of Harry and his pals in a BBC1 Omnibus documentary next Friday: "They’re fifteen now - hormones working overtime."

[pic] Romeo ... Harry, alias Daniel Radcliffe

[pic] Pal ... Helen Watson as bossy Hermione

She added: "Harry finds out a lot more about his past, and gets to go to places in the magical world we haven’t yet visited."

Rowling admitted she plans to kill off at least one major character - but refused to say who.

She said: "More people are going to die and there’s at least one death that’s going to be horrible to write."

Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix will be the fifth in the series of books that have made Rowling a multi-millionaire.

....

Not that I'm not dying to read them, but I just dread what's going to happen. Same with the other two Star Wars flicks... *heavy sigh*

*mutters* Like hell Harry and 'Mione are gonna end up together. And I bet you a tenner that the "death that’s going to be horrible to write" is either Sirius or Remus. T_T

And don't ask me what's the deal with all those capitalizations and bold letters.
silversolitaire: (Default)
  • Driving home today was a riot! So much rain, I almost got flooded! o_O
  • Forgot my handbag. Noticed it at the U and had to drive back to my flat before going to my parents' :-/... That cost me half an hour.
  • Three traffic jams on the highway. Bleh!
  • My cat welcomed me! It was so cute! I never thought he cared! But he does! He saw me and came running towards me, meowing happily and jumping into my arms! I felt so loved...
  • Billy's Boy arrived... Damn... You must know, this is the sequel to the sequel to The Front Runner. Harlan's Race comes first and this will take two weeks. Ergo, can't read it... T_T I probably won't open the parcel, I'd only read ahead.
  • Going to see The Mummy Returns tomorrow! *_*
  • Been thinking about Trowa and Treize all day. We'll have to explore that, kat. ^_~
  • norty is back! *huge hug* I missed her!
  • Okay, this episode of Digimon 02 is kinda dirty... no wonder people think about crossbreeding... ick.

Wow, there's been a lot going on in the Friends-section!!!

Okay, I'm 46.0% LJ corrupted. *check*

Hey Cam, what's the deal with the permanent accounts? o_O

Gotta take Sandrine's survey, it's kinda cool! *_*

YEEEEEEEIH!!!! *_* Took the Celebrity Match test! Wooohooo! I chose female first, of course and got AJ Cook with 100 %. No clue who she is. Liv Tyler came in on 97%. Okay, I'd take her, she's kinda cute... Then I selected male and got... Jonathan Rhys-Meyers with 100%!!!! YAAAAAY! *_* For him I'd take a quick excursion into the heterosexual world! hahaha

Let's see... Biorhythmical match... 46% physical... :-/ ... 68% emotional, okay.... 98% intellectual... *_*

Now browse for a match:

Ewan McGregor
physical: 96%
emotion: 78%
intellectual: 98%
total: 91 %
*drools*

Catherine Zeta-Jones
physical: 96 % (oooh yes)
emotion: 97%
intellectual: 50% (hmmmm)
total: 81 %
Jennifer Lopez
physical: 99%
emotion: 90%
intellectual: 4% (LOL, yeah, she's kinda stupid...)
total: 65%
David Bowie
physical: 77%
emotion: 78%
intellectual: 98%
total: 85%
I love it when they are my intellectual match! *_*

Carrie-Anne Moss
physical: 33% (really? she's hot!)
emotion: 62%
intellectual: 92%
total: 63%
Okay, good. I was starting to think this thing only gives you positive answers! LOL

Now one for a laugh!

Marilyn Manson
physical: 6%
emotion: 53%
intellectual: 41%
total: 34 %
LOL! This is fun!
silversolitaire: (Default)

I will never cease to be amazed at my bluntness.

Since yesterday I am the proud owner of my own copy of the wonderful book Celluloid Closet - Homosexuality in the Movies and the video documentary based on it from 1995. I've watched it and I now feel as if someone had switched on the lights and I'm seeing clearly now at last. All too clearly even...

Too be honest, I am mad. Yes, I am. I'm mad at the fact that I had to grow up in a world where such obvious gay references in movies had to be kept mum about. I am angry that I'm now sitting here, aged 22, and staring at the TV screen, not believing that it had never even occurred to me before, that 'Cabaret' was indeed about a gay man. And it's not even hidden! If I had watched to movie, I would have noticed it. But I didn't.
And why? Because all I knew about it was what was written in my musical encyclopedias and in that summary on my CD. And while I loved the music, I never really found the story all too appealing. Some Nazi drama about an American (English?) writer in Berlin during WW II, hooking up with a flamboyant night club singer who gets pregnant from him and he finally sees that his quest for adventure had been silly after all. *yawns* How boring. BUT! Nobody ever told me that the stage version of this musical obviously had been butchered beyond recognition. It was only the movie with Liza Minelli in '72 that was true to the original book, 'The Berlin Stories' by Christopher Isherwood. Suddenly the writer Cliff Bradshaw becomes Brian Roberts, frail and boyish, and obviously more on the same side of his pitch.

But don't get me wrong. The movie wasn't that "innocent" either. In the end, it boils down to the message that Brian in fact was rather heterosexual and his "slip" with Sally's lover Maximilian had just been a mistake and he really ought to be with Sally. Sad. Isherwood said about this that he felt as if Brian's affection for Max had been used as some kind of kink only to emphasize the heterosexual value of his relationship with Sally. In the end he gets to prove his heterosexuality in order to get the girl. That's disappointing, too. But not as much as to abandon it at all, IMO.

In a way, I agree with Harvey Fierstein here. Better a negative representation than none at all. But I only partial agree. Hollywood and the movies have become a very powerful tool to form people's opinions and ideas. Whole generations of queers had to grow up with the notion that homosexuality really is queer, twisted, weird and sick, and that it inevitably will end up in tears, anguish and death. Thank God, I grew up in a time, when it was no longer demonized. But it was invisibilitized. Now, which is worse? I can't decide, really.

I wonder, if I had grown up with the notion: there are gays out there, this is how we see them. Would I have then developed a consciousness of it sooner? Then I would have had the chance to form my opinion and know for myself: they're here and it's not wrong, for crying out loud. Just as I saw depictions of hatred and racism which I loathed and condemned, I would have been able to see them, see us, as a group that actually does exist.

But I didn't. I don't think I had any notion of homosexuality until I was 12 or so. For a very short time, I thought it was a turn off. Then I realized that I liked girls myself. I suppressed it, of course, not knowing what I was dealing with. I got into a relationship with a man, stayed with him for some time, realized that I could not suppress my need for women and get free again. Free and happy. But I was all alone. I struggled out of this horrible time myself. If there had been more films that visualize this, it all would have been a lot easier, I'm sure.

Thing is, those films existed. They were all there, all the time. I just didn't see them. And why? Because people kept mum about it. You don't talk about such films. Sure, they're there and those who are interested in it and want to know more about it are free to do so. Fine. But please don't make us acknowledge this openly, okay?

Well, thanks a bunch! If I think of all those years I was mocked and bullied by other people because I saw a gay subtext that nobody else did. I was told, "You queers always want to make everybody else queer! This is disgusting! Don't pull us all into your sordid affairs, okay?" Thing is, those things were there! It wasn't my sick sad mind that made it all up, no, it was them who were too stupid to see it themselves. It's not said explictly, thus it's not there, okay? Any questions?

Actually, yes! Why do those people turn a blind eye on gay references in movies? Hints that very intentionally placed there as it had been stated by the directors, screenwriters, actors many, many times? Why do they so desperately cling to the fact that it's no explicit, thus nonexisting? Isn't that really stupid and intolerant?

You tell me...

Now, to close my speech *g*, let me point out a few movies I always have had "under suspicion", been laughed at for my assumptions, and now finally found the proof!

Ben Hur
Now, please, don't tell me you never noticed the special kind of friendship between Judah (Charlton Heston) and Messala (Stephen Boyd). They grew up together, then parted and when reunited suddenly find each other on different sides. Judah is still a jew, now a distinguished member of society, but Messala has risen to fame in the Roman Empire. They quarrel over politics and become fierce enemies.

Messala, the villian without motivation. Supposedly. But no. See it this way. They were lovers when they were young. Messala returns, full of hope and ardour and still desperately in love with Judah. But he has to realize they no longer share a life. Both have changed, up to a point when it is impossible for them to get together again. And then Judah even rejects him. This hurts. That's how he grew to hate the one he could not have.

Makes perfectly sense. And I didn't make that all up. Gore Vidal, one of the screenwriters of Ben Hur, said that it was just intended that way. It was all laid out. But then they said "We'll never get Heston to do that!" So they only let Stephen Boyd in and he pulled it all off, and Heston played along, absolutely clueless. It's brilliant! Just look at the scene when Messala returns and they drink together and practice with their spears again (not what you think!). Handsome Messala, madly in love, eyes sparkling, touching Judah carefully, and longingly and Heston goes all "Well, old friend! haha!"
Cabaret
I elaborated my thoughts about that one before. It's a rotten shame that they have butchered the message of this movie for the stage version. Although, if I'm correctly informed, they changed that for the all new Broadway staging. Sure hope so!

As for the movie, it's brilliant. I just love the scene when Brian hisses, "Screw Maximilian!" and Sally replies, "I do!" . Brian stares at her and then he mumbles, "So do I..." That's an ingenious dialogue, IMO. And I love the scene when Brian, Sally and Maximilian kiss at the same time. That's so tender...
A Streetcar Names Desire
My ideas about that one can be read a couple of entries below. The gay "sub"text would be absolutely obvious, IF the movie industry hadn't butchered around that one as well. You must be really over-subtle to get it from the movie. Once again, the play by Tennessee Williams is so much clearer. There it leaves no doubt that Blanche found her young husband with another man, yelled at him "You make me sick!!!" and thus brought him to kill himself over the shame.

Same goes for any other Tennessee Williams screen adaptation. 'Cat on a Hot Tin Roof', classical! I think I've also talked about this one below. Brick had a love relationship with Skipper (I still don't know if that's really his name!) and he never really got over the loss. This would also explain his veritable loathing of his wife and the thought of performing his marital duties with her. In cut-scenes from the movie, we can see dialogues between Brick and Big Daddy where he accuses his son almost openly of "unnatural love".

Another very bizarre example of Williams plays for the big screen with gay themes is 'Suddenly Last Summer'. I have not seen this and I seriously doubt whether I want to. Apparently, Williams wrote this on the advice of his psychotherapist on order to come to terms with his own sexuality by "exposing the evils" of homosexuality. The result was the tale of a "degenerate poet" who first uses his demented mother and later his older cousin to lure young boys into his trap, but finds his horrible end in the frantic attack of raging urchins.

The movie later only consisted by perhaps 40% of Williams' original play, the rest was written by Gore Vidal. The catholic Legion of Decency (hum...) then approached the matter with a pair of scissors and butchered it to pieces. Surprise, surprise! Yet they decided that this film could be shown, since it illustrated the perversion and horrors of homosexuality in a mixture of obsession, madness and cannibalism. They decided, however, that the poet should never make an appearance throughout the film. The result was quite fascinating. The actor who played Sebastian Venable was cut out everywhere. All that was left was a glimpse here and there of his arm, his sleeve, his legs... he became a demon without a face. The story was told in shady flashbacks by his cousin, played by Elizabeth Taylor. That way this film became a truly disturbing horror vision.

A funny notion about this film: Katherine Hepburn played the poet's mother. She had no clue what the fuzz was all about until the director and Spencer Tracy spent one whole evening explaining to her the concept of homosexuality. She then plain refused to believe that people would actually engage in such disgusting actions and then demanded the film to be altered!
Rebel Without a Cause
That's almost classical. Young Plato, played by Sal Mineo is the obvious sissy. He has a photograph of a guy in his locker and follows Jim, played by James Dean, with ardent admiration. He probably was looking more for a father figure than a lover, but Jim returns his feelings so blatantly, that sparks fly. In a way, Jim's just as loving and caring towards Plato as he is towards his girl, played by Natalie Wood. But of course, in a time like this, none of them could act upon their desires, thus they were stuck in a constant balancing act between desire, suppression and anguish.

Of course, like so many queers in the movies, Plato finds his bloody end as well.
An additional note: That's something that really bothers me, too. Gays usually are depicted as mad, degenerate and murderous. And of course, they always die, be it by murder or suicide. No matter so many gays in the past had to feel bad about themselves. I thought this was really significant, that my beloved book included a whole Necrology listing many gays that died in the movies. Very, very sad...

I admit it! I too like to write about insanity, obsession and dark lusts, and most of my characters happen to be gay, but please, I never connect their sexual orientation with their actions! That's something we absolutely have to distinguish: you're not saying all gays are killing maniacs, just because you write about one. I'm thinking about Poppy Z. Brite's 'Exquisite Corpse'. Haven't read that one, but given that fact that she successfully wrote about sane gay characters before, I'm absolutely sure that she's not implying that those two lovers were cannibals because they were gay. Thank you. Now on with my list
.Spartacus
Ooooh yes, my beloved Spartacus with this wonderful dialogue about oysters I mentioned some posts back. Once again, the scissors erased the gay subtext, which really is a pity in this case, because that explained Antoninus' actions. He was shocked at the though of being asked to engage in actions he was not ready to do. That's why he fled from his master to join Spartacus and the other rebel slaves. I really want the DVD with the complete version!
The Maltese Falcon
Okay, not a film with real gay issues, but remember that guy who comes to visit Sam Spade? He's queer! It's suggested by him using perfume, but also the way he touches his lips with his walking stick in a very sensual way. Once again, this is not a figment of my sick mind, but I have proof. In the original novel, this guy is identified as a homosexual by Spade's secretary.

Haha! Gotcha! But this is very useful actually. See? These little facts give us hints to how Hollywood used to gloss over homosexuality and gives us a powerful tool to unveil it again. Like our own little Queer Stone of Rosette!
Those are just examples where homosexuality was effectively disguised until almost nobody saw it anymore. What I found much more astounding though, were the films that openly dealt with gay topics! And I had no clue! I did, however, see some of them. I'll make a list of a couple of those and new ones I just discovered. Just to name a few:

The Children's Hour (1962) with Audrey Hepburn and Shirley McLaine, about two teachers having a sexual relationship with each other, being accused and tried for it and ending with Shirley's character hanging herself... Shirley's scrumptious in that one. *sighs*

Making Love (1982) about a gay husband coming out and getting into a relationship with another man. A Hollywood landmark actually, probably first real gay romance on the big screen. Unfortunately a bit too blow-dried to really make people go crazy over it.

Cruising (1980); rather disgusting and anti-gay, but still interesting. With Al Pacino, about a gay policemen who goes out killing other gays. The murder scenes are atrocious.

Mädchen in Uniform (1934); German b/w movie about a girl in love with her teacher.

The Hunger (1983) with Susan Sarandon and Cathérine Deneuve about chic lesbian vampires and sweet sex scenes. I want Cathérine...


Midnight Express (1978) about a man's experiences in a Turkish prison. Supposedly falsifying Billy Hayes' original book, but it's got a sweet shower kiss scene.

Young Man With a Horn (1950) with Lauren Bacall as a drop-dead gorgeous, tantalizing lesbian. I don't think I've closed my mouth for an hour or so after I've seen her hit the screen. Gods, she was SUCH a beauty. I was bewitched by her body. She was really thin actually and I felt so bad for admiring it, but still I did. So elflike...

The Boys in the Band (1970), the first Hollywood movie in which all principal characters were gay.

Rope (1948), a Hitchcock classic and one of the 7 lost movies (or so), about two male lovers who kill a former classmate and indulge themselves in inviting friends at their place with the corpse on the premises. A shockingly brilliant flick, IMO.

Ludwig (1972); one of my personal favorites. A screen adaptation of the life of King Ludwig II of Bavaria who was gay, as we all know. Helmut Berger pulls off a grand Ludwig, youthful and beautiful. The movie was directed by Visconti and he and Berger were lovers at that time. Of course, this movie was screened censored for many years until finally restored to its full homosexual splendor.

Staircase (1969), a musical about a gay couple, with Rex Harrison and Richard Burton. Rather annoying, really, but a landmark nevertheless.

A Different Story (1978) with Perry King; disputed a lot since it's about a gay man and a lesbian, both unhappy, who falls in love and marry each other. It was accused of showing gays turning straight. I, however, think that this isn't the case. Just because you're gay, doesn't mean you have to avoid the other sex like hell. To me, this is the truest and purest expression of friendship and love, when you can be together without having sex. Admitted, I did not see the movie, so maybe they had sex, but this is just a general comment on my side! ^_^.

I have some more movies on my mind, but I can't remember the names for the hell of it. I was surprised though that one of the first things captured on film way back then in 1890-something were two men dancing! Interesting, don't you think? I now could start with the oldest written piece known to us, the Epic of Gilgamesh, around 4000 years old, describing a very intimate same sex bonding between the two male main characters, including the traditional elegy and all that, but I'll spare you that! ^_^

With that I shall close my lecture for today. I could go on about this forever, but I can't possibly do that. I've still got some stuff to write. But I just wanted to record this for the future. I'm sure I'll write more about this some other time.
silversolitaire: (Default)

Oookay. I wanted to talk about that very nice book I found in the library this Friday. More details later, just read this first:

I came across this particular dialogie. It's from the movie Spartacus. It's the older man, Crassius, taking a bath and his young slave, Antoninus attending him. They are having this conversation. Now tell me what it is about!

Crassius: Do you eat oysters?
Antoninus: Yes.
Crassius: Snails?
Antoninus: No.
Crassius: Do you consider the eating of oysters to be moral and the eating of snails to be immoral?
Antoninus: No, master.
Crassius: And taste is not the same as appetite and therefore not a question of morals, is it?
Antoninus: It could be argued so, master.
Crassius: Um, that'll do. My robe, Antoninus. Ah, my taste... it includes both oysters and snails.


...

Got it??? I think this is brilliant! They are obviously not talking about food, are they? They are talking about taste in men or women! And it's ingenious! This dialogue was later cut out from the final version. For obvious reasons. But, IMO, this would have given the film a whole new twist and much more meaning. Like why Antoninus left his master so rushedly to join the other slaves. Too bad they canned it.. :-(

I just would like to state that my taste, it includes both oysters and snails as well, but... I enjoy slurping oysters sooo much more! *snerk*

The book I got this from is called The Celluloid Closet - Homosexuality in the Movies by Vito Russo. I found this in the Queer Studies corner on the American lit library. Way cool book. I adored it endlessly. I can only recommend this to everyone. Unfortunately it ends 1989, since it's old, but hey, it's wonderful. Taught be things I never even guessed before.

I still can't calm down that I didn't get the obvious reference in A Streetcar named Desire by Tennessee Willliams. Or maybe I did, and I just forgot it. And I was so proud that I got the reference in The Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, LOL. I mean, now thinking about it, it's really sorta obvious what it was that Blanche caught her hubby doing. I remember it so well from the theater, when she runs out of the house and yells "You make me sick! You make me sick!!!!" How could I have missed that? Of course she found her husband with another man. And he killed himself over the shame... how sad. But Williams always did such great stuff.

And then in Tin Roof, Brick and... what's his name, Skipper? Now, when you think about it, it's sorta clear that Brick is gay, was in love with Skipper, who's now dead, hates Maggie for being a woman and for trying to entice Skip away from his side. It's obvious. He doesn't want to sleep with Maggie and explodes at the mere mention of Skip's name. And Maggie accuses him of it, too! She says "I hated Skipper, because you loved him so much!" And we're not talking about friendship here. She clearly says that she slept with Skipper to show him that his love is unnatural and that he has to change. Always the same construction. So tragic...

When you think of it, this is the same pattern as in the most famous love triangle, the Shakespeare Sonnets. Maggie is the Dark Lady (and what a dark lady...), Brick is the poet, aging, alcoholic and bitter. And Skipper is the young, golden-haired man. Pretty and fickle, letting himself being seduced by the Dark Lady. Classical triangulation of desire! Woohoo! *_* Now I'm feeling so smart for having realized that! *g*

Profile

silversolitaire: (Default)
silversolitaire

February 2009

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 04:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios