Evil Evolutionism!
Oct. 24th, 2003 12:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
silversolitaireOkay, I've seen this site before and I've already made fun of it, but I just happened to surf by again and I don't remember having seen this bullshit before. That's one thing I just don't get about religious nuts. I don't blame anyone for truly believing in God and Jesus. I'd never. If someone really believes in Jesus' words it only makes sense to live after them. So, it might sound odd to us to hear people say that this or that is wrong and you should always do this etc. but at least these people stick to their rules. It's not for me to question those. What I do question is people who just follow blindly, who have had it drilled into their heads that something is evil because the Bible says so and they just go along with it. That's what annoys me. When someone didn't take an active choice to believe into something but just accepts it as true because others say so.
Eh, I've digressed. Anyway, my point is, I don't get about religious nuts, CHRISTIAN religious nuts how they can so openly reject clear and present facts.
Example: The sad tale of Professor Giraffenstein and his little buddy Pepper the moth!
Fun Fact #1:
Moth: Hey Professor! Haven't dinos been extinct for million of years?
Prof: Wrong litte buddy... Dinosaurs still walk on the land and swim in the seas! And the Earth is less than 10,000 years old!
Okay... so, they ignore basically all the facts that are generally accepted by geologists, historians and a bunch of other academics. And to make it even worse they teach their children that and back it up with this hilarious site. What is this, The Lost World, part deux? And where did they nab those pictures from? Jurassic Park? How come they didn't even manage to take a decent camera with them when they supposedly saw real dinosaurs and had to resort to this pathetic doodle and why has the press never reported about this, if it happened last year? But wait, there's more!
Fun Fact #2:
Moth: I saw in a Secular movie that T-Rex was a vicious killing machine. Is this true?
Prof: No, Secular movies lie! T-Rex was a herbivore, its sharp teeth used to shred plants. The Ark's passengers were safe from harm!
This... is just... URGH! There's no animal on this world that has sharp and pointed teeth like the Tyrannosaurus Rex and is a herbiwore! It totally contradicts biology! How would the T-Rex have managed to shred plants with those teeth? And "secular"? WTF? First when I read this I was wondering why the hell people would feel the need to lie at children about that, until I read that Ark bit. And isn't this just painfully stupid? Does that mean that there weren't any carnivores in the Ark at all? So... what about lions and tiger and bears, oh my? Okay, not bears, but you get the drift.
Oh and the Bible (and our friends here) apparently endorse incest! Refer to Fun Fact #6.
And this one's my favorite...
Fun Fact #8:
Moth: My friend Bomby the bombadier beetle can shoot boiling-hot toxic chemicals out of his butt. Why?
Prof: God gave your friend that ability for defense against evil and as a testament against the false doctrine of Evolutionism!
That's RIGHT! Got nothing to add to that, thank you.
Eh, I've digressed. Anyway, my point is, I don't get about religious nuts, CHRISTIAN religious nuts how they can so openly reject clear and present facts.
Example: The sad tale of Professor Giraffenstein and his little buddy Pepper the moth!
Fun Fact #1:
Moth: Hey Professor! Haven't dinos been extinct for million of years?
Prof: Wrong litte buddy... Dinosaurs still walk on the land and swim in the seas! And the Earth is less than 10,000 years old!
Okay... so, they ignore basically all the facts that are generally accepted by geologists, historians and a bunch of other academics. And to make it even worse they teach their children that and back it up with this hilarious site. What is this, The Lost World, part deux? And where did they nab those pictures from? Jurassic Park? How come they didn't even manage to take a decent camera with them when they supposedly saw real dinosaurs and had to resort to this pathetic doodle and why has the press never reported about this, if it happened last year? But wait, there's more!
Fun Fact #2:
Moth: I saw in a Secular movie that T-Rex was a vicious killing machine. Is this true?
Prof: No, Secular movies lie! T-Rex was a herbivore, its sharp teeth used to shred plants. The Ark's passengers were safe from harm!
This... is just... URGH! There's no animal on this world that has sharp and pointed teeth like the Tyrannosaurus Rex and is a herbiwore! It totally contradicts biology! How would the T-Rex have managed to shred plants with those teeth? And "secular"? WTF? First when I read this I was wondering why the hell people would feel the need to lie at children about that, until I read that Ark bit. And isn't this just painfully stupid? Does that mean that there weren't any carnivores in the Ark at all? So... what about lions and tiger and bears, oh my? Okay, not bears, but you get the drift.
Oh and the Bible (and our friends here) apparently endorse incest! Refer to Fun Fact #6.
And this one's my favorite...
Fun Fact #8:
Moth: My friend Bomby the bombadier beetle can shoot boiling-hot toxic chemicals out of his butt. Why?
Prof: God gave your friend that ability for defense against evil and as a testament against the false doctrine of Evolutionism!
That's RIGHT! Got nothing to add to that, thank you.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-10-25 02:34 am (UTC)Of course, if you believe that God created everything then the existence of trees, plants, diesel oil and marshmallows are all evidence of God; however, they could all be evidence of something else. In the end, the only important miracles take place inside people's heads; the only pattern you can discover in the gospel to Jesus's willingness to perform miracles (or unwillingness to perform like a trick monkey with @signs@) is that the recipients of the miracles really needed them -- they aren't supposed to be some kind of proof ....
no subject
Date: 2003-10-25 02:48 am (UTC)As for miracles, they are meant as some kind of proof when taken as the justification to canonize someone. Since, even though it may not seem like it anymore, three miracles or more are still a prerequirement for sainthood. So, the Saint Factory, oops, the Vatican has a great interest in being able to prove miracles. Advocatus Diaboli and all that. But God himself is not supposed to have to prove his existence, yes. What would be the point of a dogma then.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-25 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-25 03:04 am (UTC)But yes, just because the lightning bolt doesn't crash down right in front of you doesn't mean that Zeus hasn't been aiming at you the entire time ^.~.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-25 03:17 am (UTC)