Somehow it really bothers me that the Doctor actually *sees* Jack running towards them and he tries to make a quick get away! Unless I'm misinterpreting that look and zoom on the Doctor's face, but I doubt it! He IS looking on the screen, isn't he? What has Jack ever done to him? If anything, it would be the other way around! Unless of course the Doctor was afraid of being taken revenge on? But then again, we're talking about the guy who holds idle chats with Daleks, so I really doubt that D:. *miffs* I love the Doctor, but when I have to choose I'm going to pick Jack. My poor Jack... *pets* It really bothers me is that the Doctor didn't pick him up as we thought (well, spoilers already suggested otherwise, but seeing is believing), but it rather was an accident. Where's the loyality to your former companions, man???
Of course, only Jack would be able to cling outside of the Tardis while it's travelling. He's probably going through a thousand lives that way... haha. Although I will admit that the acting is just the tiniest bit over the top, don't you think? ^^;;; What's with all the yelling and D: faces? Also, it amuses me greatly that Jack has this neat backpack all ready to go. Haha...
Here, if anyone wants to check it out. Might get shot down by the BBC soon though...
Of course, only Jack would be able to cling outside of the Tardis while it's travelling. He's probably going through a thousand lives that way... haha. Although I will admit that the acting is just the tiniest bit over the top, don't you think? ^^;;; What's with all the yelling and D: faces? Also, it amuses me greatly that Jack has this neat backpack all ready to go. Haha...
Here, if anyone wants to check it out. Might get shot down by the BBC soon though...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 07:48 am (UTC)Hmm, it does look as if the Doctor is rather anxious to get away from Jack, doesn't it? I wonder what that's all about... (Of course, Jack is bound to ask questions, which will eventually leads to talking about Rose, and the Doctor has made quite clear in his talks with Martha that he's not ready for that.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 04:21 pm (UTC)Is it bad that I'm almost looking forward more to Utopia than I am to my own high school graduation? Heh. Oops.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 11:01 pm (UTC)And GRRRRRRRAR! I keep watching it but it's not getting any better!!!!!!!!! *miffs*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 11:07 pm (UTC)But maybe that's not even what this is about. The trailer/preview might very well be misleading. Wouldn't be the first time.
When in Rome Fic
Date: 2007-06-03 12:10 pm (UTC)I followed a link from Jantolution for your story When In Rome to your LJ, but I seem your fic is friends only. Can you friend me please, so that I can read it?
Re: When in Rome Fic
Date: 2007-06-03 12:14 pm (UTC)Re: When in Rome Fic
Date: 2007-06-03 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 10:43 am (UTC)I have "friended" not_gold, as you suggested. Please don't be offended, but because I only have a basic LJ with a limited number of friend slots to use, I have unfriened (?) your private LJ.
Love your animated icons and the longer clip on YouTube: very well done!
I wonder if Jack's backpack contains the Doctor's hand in its jar? Jack after all wouldn't know the Doctor grew a new one, and Jack probably thinks he's doing the Doctor a favour returning it so that he can be reattached. Only two weeks to go to find out...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:11 am (UTC)One thing I notice is that ideally you should post your reply to a comment within the thread. Like right now you basically opened a new comment thread on this post since you probably clicked the "reply" link right after the post. It works anyhow since I got the reply mailed and all and could respond to it, but many times people do this in their own post in a comm for example or when they've actually been talking to someone else in a thread of some post. Then, when you do this, the person who originally made the post (commonly referred to as original poster or OP) gets the comment mailed, but not the person you were talking to and then they might never see it and never reply.
In short, ideally look for the last post in the comment thread and then click the "reply" link there, not on the main post. Or click the "Reply to the comment" link when you get the reply mailed to you. That way, your reply gets added to the thread, everyone who reads along understand that those belong together and the person you were talking to is able to follow the conversation. ^^
I had no idea that basic accounters had a friends limit! Are you sure? That is so nasty! D: What's the limit?
Thanks for the nice comments. I really need to do more animations... *g*
I'm not sure about the hand! Maybe it does... but when you think about it, the clip suggests that the Doctor is only stopping for a couple of seconds, so unless Jack had the backpack all ready to go he wouldn't have been able to make it. Hell, I doubt you can even make it out of the Hub in that time! I'll be interested to see how they solved that... *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 06:01 am (UTC)Basic accounts have a limit of 25 friends, which I think also includes communities. I presume this limit is an incentive to encourage people to upgrade to an account that includes advertising, or a paid account. I'm happy with the basic option, at the moment anyway. Sort of a try before I buy!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 10:21 am (UTC)Really, only 25? That's not much O.o. I was wondering about that yesterday and a friend said it was 1000 or so and that seemed surprising as I've been on LJ for over nearly years and even if I had never unfriended anyone ever I probably wouldn't be significantly over 200. But 25 is really a bummer :/.
I've had a paid account for years. I can't imagine going back to normal. *pets LJ*