(no subject)
Jan. 26th, 2004 11:36 pmPlease read all of these author's works! XD
http://www.livejournal.com/users/fandom_scruples/804.html#cutid1
You go, people! *slaps shoulders*
EDIT: Should I be pouty that I'm not on this list? I have HP pr0n on the net, too, dammit!
http://www.livejournal.com/users/fandom_scruples/804.html#cutid1
You go, people! *slaps shoulders*
EDIT: Should I be pouty that I'm not on this list? I have HP pr0n on the net, too, dammit!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 02:57 pm (UTC)Why should it be wrong for kid who's old enough to look FOR porn, to look AT porn? We always got to see all the porn we wanted, when we wanted. If it wasn't THAT HARMFUL to children growing up, wouldn't half the European grown-ups be psychotic crack whores or something?
Bastards should have a look at their crime rates and lock up their VIOLENCE, not their porn. Honestly, what's so bad about sex. It wasn't such a bad thing when they lost their virginity in a car's back seat at 14.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 03:05 pm (UTC)Why would they make that list?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 03:23 pm (UTC)However, it's not the job of the providers, the government of the general public to look for this guidance. It's the parents' responsibility. We can't go ahead and cleanse the internet of all unclean and unfit content. That's ridiculous. It has to remain and free and open source. It's the parents' job to check what their kids are doing online, it's their job to engage filters and net-protection programs to keep their computers clean. Theirs and theirs alone. Not ours. The most I could imagine is to develop some sort of code everyone can put into their adult websites and then equip every browser with the ability to not show sites with that code. Something like that. But that's the parents' fucking responsibility. GUIDANCE!
And I totally agree on the violence bit. Violence is just as bad as porn, if not worse, and nobody seems to have a problem with that! -.-
no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 03:27 pm (UTC)There are a lot of things on the internet that kids shouldn't see. But it's up to their parents to monitor their online activity, not the authors. A personal website is just that, and people should be able to post whatever they'd like, without fear of blacklists.
Perhaps I'm a bit too liberal with that, but it's how I feel.
Silly people.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 04:16 pm (UTC)I'm not saying we should spoon-feed 8 year olds porn and horror because it's good for them. But as a rule of thumb I think any child that's mature enough to enter "snuff horse anal rape" into Kazaa has the mental equipment to deal with the results. I would just want to be there, have the chance to help them learn to deal with things that scare them. And when you create taboos you'll never get that chance. I think even the attempt to "cleanse" their environment of anything that might or might not be disturbing to them is taking away their chance of learning to deal with possible negative influences in a responsible way.
My own parents just systematically isolated me from anything that could have been disturbing to me, which in the end left me vulnerable and alone when I finally had to deal with all the bad things in the world. To grow up took me much longer than anyone else I know.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 09:58 am (UTC)