What academics really mean
Mar. 31st, 2008 09:27 pmFound this this weekend and in the light of my Master's thesis this seems rather relevant. And oh so true! XD
What academics really mean:
What academics really mean:
- It has long been known (I haven't bothered to look up the reference)
- A trend is evident (These data are practically worthless)
- Typical results are shown (this is the prettiest graph)
- In my experience (once)
- In case after case (twice)
- In a series of cases (thrice)
- It is believed that (I think)
- It is generally believed that (a couple of others think so too)
- It is not unreasonable to assume (If you believe this, you'll believe anything)
- Correct within an order of magnitude (wrong)
- According to statistical analysis (it is rumored)
- Of great theoretical importance (I find it kind of interesting)
- Of great practical importance (I can get some mileage out of it)
- Typical results are shown (The best results are shown)
- Three of the samples were chosen for this study (the other samples didn't make any sense)
- It has not been possible to provide definitive answers (The experiment was negative, but at least I can publish the data somewhere)
- It might be argued that... (I have such a good answer for this objection that I shall now raise it)
- I thank X for assistance with the experiments and Y for useful discussions on the interpretation of the data. (X did the experiment and Y explained it to me.)
- It is significant (I'm not sure how, but you can probably figure it out)
- Mainstream scholars believe (I'm ignoring everyone I disagree with)
- To put this statement in context (Let me spend five pages detailing my irrelevant historical research)
- Beyond the scope of this essay/study (I don't feel like talking about it)
- Only tangentially relevant (I'm thoroughly sick of talking about it)
- New research has shown (Everyone else is wrong)